Coronavirus situation under control in Delhi, not terrible, says Kejriwal
Maruti reports 54% YoY decline in sales in June; sells less than 40% of pre-coronavirus level
Government Bans 59 Chinese Apps Including Tik-Tok, Shareit, UC Browser, and WeChat
PM Modi to address the nation at 4 pm: What to expect
Maharashtra Extends Lockdown Till July 31 Day After Urging Caution
Coronavirus Vaccine Update
Swarms Of Desert Locusts Reach Delhi Outskirts After Gurugram
Delhi fighting difficult battle against COVID-19, will emerge victorious: Kejriwal
2-Week Lockdown In Guwahati From Monday; Minister Says "Shop By Sunday"
YouTube likely to come up with TikTok-like short video platform
Rs 2,000 crore from PM CARES Fund to be spent on 50,0000 ventilators for COVID-19 patients
Baba Ramdev's Patanjali launches India's 'first Ayurvedic' medicine for coronavirus, Coronil
Coronavirus: Glenmark conducts Fabiflu trial on 1,000 patients; to compete with Gilead's Remdesivir
Jio's golden touch makes Reliance Industries share rise 108% in 3 months
Coronavirus vaccine: When will it be ready? Moderna, AstraZeneca offer answers
Chennai lockdown starts today: Check what is allowed, not allowed
Coronavirus vaccine: Singapore scientists discover 5 antibodies that can combat COVID-19
India-China tension: Indian Army releases list of 20 martyrs; wreath ceremony begins in Leh
Tamil Nadu announces 'maximised restricted lockdown' from June 19 in Chennai, 3 other districts
Maruti Suzuki's Alto becomes India's top-selling car for 16th year in a row

Latest Posts

Supreme Court dismisses batch of petitions seeking review of Ayodhya land dispute case verdict

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of petitions seeking review of its November 9 Ayodhya land dispute case verdict on Thursday, which cleared the way for construction of a Ram Temple at the disputed site.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde, which took these review pleas for consideration in-chamber, rejected them after finding no merits. Justice Sanjiv Khanna has replaces the former CJI Ranjan Gogoi on the bench that delivered the verdict.

Jamiat-Ulama-i-Hind was the first party to challenge the verdict of the court. They said that complete justice can be done in the case only if Babri Masjid is allowed to be rebuilt at the disputed site. It said that the Supreme Court's order to build a temple at the site is virtually a direction to demolish Babri Masjid because if the mosque had not been illegally demolished, the order would have required the destruction of the mosque to build the temple.

At least seven review petitions were filed with the backing of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) citing serious illegalities in the judgment of the apex court.

The Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha was also one of the petitioners. It challenged the court's finding that the disputed structure was a mosque. It stated that references in the judgment to "mosque/Babri Masjid" should be changed to "disputed structure".

The November 9 judgment by the Supreme Court stated that the 2.77-acre disputed land in Ayodhya must go to child deity Ram Lalla Virajman, while a separate 5 acre of land were given to the Muslims for the construction of a new mosque.


Alert Message

Please Wait...

Share the Opinion Poll with your Friends At


Share the Survey with your
Friends At