Army Chief General Bipin Rawat said on Thursday that in the Indian Army, gay sex and adultery will not be allowed. The army chief gave this statement by the Supreme Court a few months after the Supreme Court had decided to exclude gay relations between the category of crime and to terminate a legal provision related to British carnality.

Responding to a question related to the impact of two Supreme Court judgments, General Rawat said, "It is not acceptable in the army."

The Army Chief said that his force is not above the law but it is not possible to allow gay sex and adultery in the army. They said on adultery, "The army is conservative. Army is a family.We can not let this happen in the army. '

He said that soldiers and officers deployed on the borders can not be worried about their family. The conduct of army personnel is governed by the Army Act.

General Rawat said, 'We never felt in the army that it could happen. Anything that was felt was inserted into the Army Act. When the Army Act was made then it was not heard about it.We never thought this was going to happen. We never allow it. That's why it was not put into the Army Act. "

He said, 'I think that what is being said or what is being talked about will not be permitted in the Indian Army.' However, as well as General Rawat said that the army is not above the law and the Supreme Court is the highest judicial institution in the country.

Actually, the army is battling fornication and the accused often face the court martial . In the language of the language, fornication is defined as "to gain the love of the wife of a fellow officer".

The Army Chief said in a press conference before the Army Day on January 15, "We are not beyond the law of the country, but when you join the Indian Army, you have the right. They are not with us. There is a difference in some things. '

It is noteworthy that in September last, the Constitution Bench of five judges of the Supreme Court had unanimously rejected the Section 377 of IPC, which declared unconventional sexual relations with adults in mutual consent among adults . The court had said that it violates the right to equality.

Last year, the Supreme Court, while annuling the British-style legal provision for adultery, said it is unconstitutional and considers women as 'property of husbands'.

In Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan has not been able to fight its activities. On Thursday morning, the Pakistani army violated the seizure for the third consecutive day in Poonch sector adjacent to the border. Indian troops responded to the firing on behalf of Pakistan. In the last three days, Pakistan has violated the cesfire 7 times.

Pakistan Army also fired on ceasefire and fired on mortar shells in Jammu and Kashmir on advance posts on the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. An official from the Department of Defense gave this information. He told that Pakistani soldiers targeted the checkpoints in Gulmpur and Khari Karamara in Poonch district.

They said, "At around nine o'clock in the morning, Pakistani army violated the ceasefire without provocation, launched pellets and shells with small arms and heavy caliber weapons in Poonch." They said that the Indian soldiers responded to it.

Pakistan is continuously violating ceasefire agreement with India in 2003. In the last 15 years, Pakistani troops violated the ceasefire by 2,936 times in the last 15 years.

During the past one week, Pakistani troops targeted the front posts in Mankot, Khari Karamara, Gulpur and Poonch areas. However, there was no casualties in it. Lt Gen Ranbir Singh, Chief of Northern Command, visited the areas in advance on Monday and reviewed the security situation in the districts of Jammu and Rajouri.

Important citizenship amendment bill for North Eastern states has got approval in the Lok Sabha. After this, Assam's Finance Minister Hemant Biswas has claimed that this bill is very important for the Indian government because it has saved 17 assembly seats from the state of Jinnah or AIUDF. INDIA TODAY correspondent Kaushik Deka talked to Hemant Biswash on this issue.

On the question of increasing the Hindu population in Assam through this bill, Hemant Biswas said that his statement is being misrepresented. Hemant said that he had said that citizens should be given citizenship to such refugees who have been expelled from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan on religious grounds.

Apart from the Hindus, among these refugees, there are people of Christian, Jain and Buddhist religions who have been compelled to flee from these three countries due to their religion over the last several decades. On the Citizenship Amendment Bill passed in the Lok Sabha, Sharma said that this bill fully respects the secular faith of India and there is nothing to do with this Bill's religion. This bill only speaks of the rights of minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan and it is entirely within the definition of secular government given at the time of independence by the Congress party.

The decision of the Narendra Modi government to give a 10 percent reservation to poor upper castes on economic basis has been supported by Bahujan Samaj Party supremo Mayawati. Talking to the media on Tuesday, Mayawati said her party supports this decision and will support the Constitution Amendment Bill to be introduced in Parliament. However, Mayawati also demanded to increase the quota of quota for reservation of about 50 per cent of the SC / ST and OBC classes presently.

On Tuesday, Mayawati said that the decision to reserve reservation for the upper castes is an election stunt. Why did not the government decide this earlier?

The BSP supremo also said that the 49.5 per cent reservation given to SC / ST, OBC in the country is needed to be reviewed. He argued that the population is increasing in such a way that the proportion of castes is also increasing, so the need to review is needed.

Mayawati appealed, saying that the proportion of reservation should also be increased on the basis of increased population, for which a new constitutional system should be implemented.Not only this, Mayawati said that reservation for these sections should also be given in areas where reservations are not given.

The Supreme Court has refused an immediate hearing on a petition demanding linking Aadhaar card to the voter ID. Explain that a petition has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking consideration of its decision on the Aadhaar scheme. The Supreme Court had declared the Center's flagship base scheme as constitutionally valid.

The Constitution bench had said that there is nothing in the Aadhar Act that violates the privacy of one person. A bench headed by then Chief Justice Deepak Mishra also upheld the passing of the Aadhaar Bill in the Lok Sabha like Money Bills. This reconsideration petition was filed by Imtiaz Ali Pulsania. Imtiaz Ali had filed an interim petition in the top court even when the validity of the Aadhaar scheme was going on.